![]() Integrated Non-Destructive with using Plugins ![]() Varina used Photoshop Layers and Mask to convert one of her landscape photos into a tiny planet. Tiny planet created using Photoshop Layers & Masks ![]() This means that Lightroom cannot blend specific parts of an image that pro landscape photographers frequently need to create natural looking high dynamic range photos. However, this is a turnkey solution with very few controls available to control how the exposure blending occurs. Lightroom has excellent HDR (high dynamic range) capabilities that landscape photographers love. Manual Exposure Blending for Landscape Photography Now that we’ve looked at a few basic similarities and differences between these two post-processing software programs, I want to discuss further what we can do with Photoshop that we cannot do with Lightroom. Advance healing and correction tools can be combined with Photoshop Selections and Layer Masks can be used to provide an incredible amount of precision during post processing. But Photoshop does not stop there with its features! It also enables you to work on individual color channels which brings a variety of creative post-processing options for photographers. These features provide nature photographers with ultimate control over local adjustments. Both these features work together as well as with all of the other adjustment tools in Photoshop. To achieve these local adjustments, Photoshop provides two very powerful features: Selections and Layer Masks. Also, local adjustments in Photoshop can be extremely precise even down to a single pixel (Lightroom doesn’t have this ability). With Photoshop, you can work on multiple images using Photoshop Layers feature. Which brings us to two of the biggest advantages of working with Adobe Photoshop. They are well-suited for photographers who are looking to balance light, manage contrast, and correct some basic coloring on a single image. However, these local adjustment features are quite simple and basic when compared to what is found in Photoshop. Over the years, Lightroom has also added some local adjustment capabilities using brushes, gradient filters, and range masks. With these, the software is geared towards photographers who want to bring out the most incredible details and vibrant colors produced by their DSLR and mirrorless cameras. Some of the most powerful editing features are built into its RAW converter. ![]() Not only is it a highly sophisticated photo management tool, but you can also use it as an RAW converter. Before I try to answer this question, let’s look at what each program does best and when to use each one.Īdobe Lightroom is a tool with two very powerful functions combined into one. The answer to this question depends upon what you are trying to accomplish with your nature photography. So, how do you choose between the two? Lightroom vs. Although the two programs do share some overlapping capabilities, there is an ongoing debate about which one is the best software program for nature photography. Two of the current and most popular software programs for post processing are Adobe Lightroom and Adobe Photoshop. This step is now, after all, an integral part of a typical digital nature photography workflow. With the advent of DSLR and mirrorless cameras, every landscape photographer wants to master the art of post-processing. I’m willing to admit, the anticipation was fun! But times have certainly changed. We never quite knew what sort of photos would come back to us. Back then Photoshop was associated with computer geeks and designers. Back in the “old days”, we used to shoot photos with our film cameras and then take the film to the local lab to have them developed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |